The need for wearable pressure sensors has significantly increased in recent years due to their extensive application in the medical and Internet of Things (IoT) domains. These advanced sensors are crucial in monitoring and providing valuable data regarding human motion and physiological signals. They play an essential role in capturing human movement dynamics, including intricate muscle activities [1] and specific joint movements such as arm motion [2] and knee bending [2,3]. Additionally, these sensors are essential for monitoring vital signs such as pulse rate [4,5,6,7], respiration [1], and even phonation detection [2,8], which is the ability to detect and analyze sounds produced by the vocal cords. The information obtained from wearable pressure sensors is invaluable in numerous applications. In the medical field, these sensors contribute to more accurate diagnosis, patient monitoring, and the development of personalized treatment plans. For instance, tracking muscle movement and joint activities can aid in the rehabilitation process, allowing for real-time feedback and adjustments to therapy protocols. Monitoring pulse rate and respiration provides critical data for managing cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, ensuring timely interventions. Furthermore, in the realm of the IoT, these sensors enable enhanced human–machine interactions and smart environments, offering a seamless integration of technology into daily life. The manufacturing technology for flexible electronics, which underpins the development of wearable pressure sensors, is generally based on advanced printing techniques. Inkjet printing [9,10,11,12] is widely used due to its precision and ability to create the fine patterns necessary for high-performance sensor components. This method allows for the deposition of functional materials onto flexible substrates, forming the essential layers of the sensors. Screen printing [12,13,14,15], another prevalent technique, is known for its cost-effectiveness and scalability. It involves transferring ink through a mesh screen to create thicker and more durable sensor layers, suitable for various flexible electronic applications. The combination of these advanced manufacturing technologies ensures the production of reliable, flexible, and high-performance wearable pressure sensors. By leveraging inkjet and screen printing methods, manufacturers can achieve the necessary precision, efficiency, and adaptability required to meet the growing demands in medical and IoT applications. As a result, these sensors continue to evolve, providing increasingly sophisticated solutions for monitoring and enhancing human health and interaction with technology.
Flexible substrate-based pressure sensors have been extensively studied. For illustration, Congcong Yang et al. designed a film with a double surface structure to create a sandwich resistive pressure sensor, demonstrating excellent parameters including a high sensitivity (77.78 kPa−1, 24 Pa minimum detection), a wide detection range (0.024–230 kPa), a fast response time (30 ms), and a high reliability over 5000 repetitive cycles. Mohammed Mohammed Ali et al. [16] developed a printed strain sensor by screen printing a silver nanowire (Ag NW)/silver (Ag) flake composite on a flexible and stretchable thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) substrate. The sensor was tested in two configurations, as follows: a straight line and a wavy line. The average resistance changes over 100 cycles were 104.8%, 177.3%, and 238.9%, and over 200 cycles were 46.8%, 141.4%, and 243.6% for elongations of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm, respectively. This sensor is intended for biomedical and civil infrastructure applications. Daniel Gräbner et al. [17] examined the influence of electrode geometry on the performance and cross-sensitivity to strain in screen-printed pressure sensors. Their findings indicate that pressure sensitivity increases with the number of interdigital electrodes, while temperature cross-sensitivity remains unaffected by electrode configuration. Dinesh Maddipatla et al. [18] developed a carbon nanotube (CNT)-based pressure sensor for pressure monitoring applications. The flexible capacitive pressure sensor was fabricated using screen printing technology, employing CNT ink for the top and bottom electrodes and PDMS for the non-conductive dielectric layer. The sensor exhibited an 8.2% change in capacitance at a maximum detectable pressure of 337 kPa, a 0.021% change in capacitance per kPa, and a correlation coefficient of 0.9971. Potential applications include sports, military, robotics, automotive, and biomedical fields. Sepehr Emamian et al. [19] successfully fabricated a fully printed piezoelectric-based touch sensor device on flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and paper substrates using screen printing. The device utilized silver (Ag) ink and sandwiched a screen-printed polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric layer between the printed Ag top and bottom electrodes. Sensitivities of 1.2 V/N and 0.3 V/N, with correlation coefficients of 0.9954 and 0.9859, were achieved for the PET- and paper-based sensors, respectively. These sensors are suitable for both touch- and force-based applications. As shown by these examples, pressure sensors fabricated using this technology feature flexible PDMS substrates [20,21], contrasting with the rigid substrates used in traditional electronics. Screen printing remains the most prevalent method for printed electronics, as highlighted in the review by Saleem Khan et al. [22].
A new pressure sensor developed in our laboratories features a novel architecture, as illustrated in Figure 1. To enhance sensitivity, the substrate consists of two layers of PDMS with micro-pyramids, topped with a sensitive layer printed on Kapton (Goodfellow, Coraopolis, PA, USA).
Figure 3. Diagram for tests of the resistive film assembly with elastomeric substrate, for compression.
The device used for the compression tests is the Mecmesin MultiTest 2.5I (Mecmesin, Slinfold, West Sussex, UK), together with the Emperor™ Force software v1.18 (Mecmesin, Slinfold, West Sussex, UK). MECMESIN is a single-column computerized tensile testing machine suitable both for metal and non-metallic materials testing. This machine adopts a mechanical and electrical integration design, mainly composed of a force sensor, a transmitter, a microprocessor, a load driving mechanism, and a computer. It has a wide and accurate range of loading speed and force measurement, the ability to measure and control the load, and the displacement has a high precision and sensitivity, but it can also carry out the automatic control test of constant speed loading and constant speed displacement.
Using Mecmesin MultiTest 2.5I, one can test various materials, semi-finished products, and finished products for their tensile strength, compressive strength, and elongation—elongation can be used for peeling, tearing, bending, compression, and other tests; these tests are suitable for metal, plastic, rubber, textiles, synthetic chemicals, wire and cable, leather, and other industries. Due to its capabilities to be programmed in a flexible manner, it could be used easily for cycle testing the pressure sensors. The measurements of the screen-printed resistors were performed with the FLUKE 8846A 6-1/2 Digit multimeter (Fluke, Everett, WA, USA), plus the Pomona 6730–Wide Jaw Kelvin Lead Set test leads (Pomona Electronics, Everett, WA, USA,). The power supply used is Agilent E3648A (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a dual output power supply—two 8 V, 5 A or 20 V, 2.5 A. The resistor used in the electrical scheme for testing has a value of 6750 Ω and a tolerance of ±5%.